Just last month Twitter, the social networking site, prepared for its first annual "Twestival", an occassion in which 200 cities around the world held events to promote networking and to raise money within local communities as well as raise funds for charity: water, a nonprofit
that installs wells and rainwater harvesting systems in developing countries (see logo to the right). In one day over 10,000 attendees around the world had donated approximately a quarter of a million dollars to help improve the water quality in Africa and India. The overnight success of online giving sites like Twestival has superceded all of the conventional standards of fundraising. One change in convention is the time distribution for a charity campaign; typically charaties hold philanthropic galas that have a team working for an entire year planning and preparing for the event. However, Twestival, for example operates under extremely short time frames with no infrastructure or staff in order to quickly and effectively reach the online masses. Secondly, Twestival makes simple and direct requests for donations unlike other organizations that convolute their purpose amidst elaborate dinner parties other such round about efforts to get money for the cause. Therefore the changes in fundraising brought about by online social-giving reflect the current needs of the time by offering a more salient message to the donors. With the current economic crisis online fundraisers eliminate the excess red tape that surround charities and remove the additional time and overhead needed to prepare and promote events, resulting in low cost quick and easy money-making events.
Additionally online fundraising does more then just raise money, they foster a sense of community and connectedness among their users. Both Facebook and MySpace have incorporated a “Causes” application on the site that allow users to create causes, take donations, and recruit members (example screen shot pictured left). This application is one of the most popular on the site with over 12 million users supporting more than 80,000 nonprofit causes worldwide. The application generated about $2.5 million dollars of donations the year of its launch and has an array of different organizations ranging from political, religious, and social cause charities. Facebook has approximately 60,000 daily users of the application and MySpace reports about 25,000 users per day which reinforces how influential of a resource social networks have been for attracting users to online fundraising. The application incorporates some psychological principles of reinforcement and incentive to motivate members to join as well as encourage their friends to join a particular cause. The system works as follows: first an individual chooses any charitable cause that he or she is interested in, then the information of the individual’s selection is posted in his or her news feed for others to see, if the individual recruits a friend to the same cause the total amount of “money raised” increases. Therefore people who are passionate about a cause will attempt to recruit other peers to join a particular cause and continue to engage in ongoing participation on the site.
Following the success of the previously mentioned models of online fundraising, there are currently many new cyber charities blossoming to cater to the needs of today’s social citizens. Two of the most prominent sites include Kiva.org, which permits users to donate directly to those in need, and Change.org another successful social action network. These sites have remained popular due to the interactive nature of the content such as incorporating blogging and video posting. Another promising site is SocialActions.com where regular challenges are posted to encourage participant’s to come up with “innovations for distributing opportunities to make a difference across the Internet and mobile devices.” Finally, the most recent online fundraising installment is ActiveCause.com a site in which donors can not only interact with one another, they can also track the giving patterns of major corporations. While philanthropy has typically operated by attracting individuals to a cause, these new forms of online fundraising are a more aggressive modes of delivering the cause to the masses. Nonprofits in many ways must operate like a business; to survive they must understand their audience, market to their constiuents, employ the most effect and current tools. For now the fusion of the technology and philanthropy have had prolific results and its lasting success will be determined by users maintaining ongoing interest and participation as well as web developers consistenly specializing philanthropic sites to the specific needs of the time.

I will start by saying that your topic of non-profit organizations is particularly interesting. As you stated in this post, technology was once a privilege to a “stratified segment of the population”. I agree with this statement and it would seem that the act of donating would also fall under the category of the select few. With the seamless integration of technology and philanthropy, I would venture to say that the internet has granted N.P.O’s with a new vehicle to reach the masses. While the elaborate galas for the riches may still be applicable to the elite, sites like Twitter and Facebook have now positively reached out to anyone with an ounce of concern on any given topic.
ReplyDeleteWhile your post mentions the clear advantages of having these charitable organizations accessible via the internet, I cannot help but wonder if there are any hidden disadvantages. Do you think that perhaps this new venue for giving will also breed a new means of cheating the general population of their hard earned money? While I personally believe this is a time-appropriate venue for charitable organizations, I simply question the means of security one might have in giving over the web. The traditional method of the large and expensive gala may seem elitist to some, but perhaps an intimate setting with the face of the charity is worth the year of planning that the night consumed. For some reason, i would not comfortable sending money to a charity hiding behind a computer in an unknown location. As a struggling and aspiring designer, I do not see myself either attending one of these dinners or even giving any significant monetary contribution to any of the 80,000 N.P.O’s on Causes, however, I could see myself offering my time to a local contribution. This teaming of online social networks with the many charitable organizations seems to be a perfect fit in that it allows ordinary people like myself a proper setting to get together with others with similar interests and give back to the community. At the very least, the emerging popularity of Facebook and similar sites will help add to the awareness of the better N.P.O's.
Sherry, your pos t is quite inviting and informational about the rapid transformation and structural shape in which non-profit organization have found new innovative ways to reach their audience. What is even better and can possibly be derived from the article is that while these creative ideas has positive outcomes such as cutting the red tape and eliminating certain overhead, it is yet another instrument to reach a new audience. The “causes” application on facebook is one of those features that can raise attention to new donors that would normally stand outside the non-profit. Furthermore, your links are very helpful in further expanding an understanding on the topic together with examples of the various websites that are in fashion currently. Additionally, the article brings about further curiousity in the difference of old fashion way of doing things compared to the new way spurred by technology. This raise another issue which is whether the old way has or will diminish in the near future or whether they function very fine side by side dependent of each other. Finally, your artcile is very helpful in comprehending and followng up current trends in the non-profit sector, however this makes me curious whether there are any other aspects of non-profit that are compromised with this current trend. Again, I really enjoyed an effortless reading and your writing is very concise and clear.
ReplyDelete