"Octuplets Grandfather pleads for money on Oprah: Angels in Waiting offers home and full time care"
Comment
You argue that the donations given to Angels in Waiting go to Nayda Suleman. In reality it will be her children that will receive the direct benefit through care and services, as no money will be given directly to h
er. Giving to charities that are run by professional nurses and caretakers such as “Angels” are a much better alternative than giving directly to “Nadya Suleman Family Website” where “donations” are more likely to go directly toward enabling Ms. Suleman’s maniacal and narcissistic behavior. Few would argue that Nadya Suleman lacks the capacity to raise these children, but the children should not be punished for their mother’s ineptness. I think it is wrong to argue that there will be a drop in donations to “Angels” because ultimately the Suleman children are the ones that need help more than any children I can think of. There is no doubt that some donors will be turned off by the association of “Angels” with the cause célèbre of the octuplets, but ultimately the press and publicity associated with helping with octuplets will be a springboard to raise more donations and in turn help more families and children than the charity would not have been able to support with its previous donor base. These children may group up to change world and by providing them with proper care at this stage in their development we can insure that they have the right foundation to live healthy productive lives."Octuplets' Mother Gets a Giant Babysitting Offer"
Comment

It is shameful to see charities such as “Angels in Waiting” and people like Gloria Allred try to exploit the Suleman octuplets for publicity and fame. The offer made by “Angels” is neither sincere nor realistic. It is reported that the monthly cost to support these children is $135,000 and it a hard to believe that a charity like “Angels” has the funds to provide such support to the Seleman’s. Furthermore, the offer was given via e-mail and has an expiration date for this Thursday (2/26/2009), a few days after the babies are expected to be released from the hospital, which leads one to believe that the neither the delivery method nor ability to respond to the offer are realistic. There is an implicit ethical morality that charities are not supposed to profit from the people they are trying to help. Offering free services to Nadya Suleman enables her to use more of the money she is receiving from exploiting her children through the sale of pictures to tabloids to fuel her need for celebrity. There will be a time when Ms. Suleyman will no longer be able to care for her children and child welfare services will take on their care. Although Ms. Suleyman has her own issues, society needs to stop creating celebrities out of people with problem and in this case need to stop exploiting eight innocent children. I applaud the Learning Channel for not pursuing a reality show with Nadya Suleman and networks for turning down her demands for $2 million dollars for her first interview . It is a poor reflection on our society when media outlets stop exploiting issues and non-profit organizations try to gain off them. To be quite honest, blogging on the subject is likely to further perpetuating exploitation of the octuplets and inflate the celebrity of Nadya Suleman.


